November 23, 2013

An Appeal to College-Bound Students

So I am interrupting the Belgic Confession series to post about a topic that is near and dear to my heart. I read in my devotions this morning 1 Timothy 4:7b-8. 

"Rather train yourself for godliness; for while bodily training is of some value, godliness is of a value in every way, as it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come."

What immediately popped to my mind was the high school football state semi-final match up this afternoon that I will be watching between South Christian and Comstock Park. I am an alumni of South Christian who has youth group students on the football team. (South Christian also won the state title last year).

Also, the South Christian volleyball team is in the state finals today vs Pontiac Notre Dame Prep which also has some youth group students on it.

And this verse also reminds me of the influence that sports has on people. Now I am not going to go on and on ranting about high school and younger aged sports. However, I want to note one thing--these students on all four of these teams (and all teams really), worked long hours this past summer (and prior summers) at camps and training sessions and lifting weights; they put in long hours on the field and in the gym this past fall--three weeks before the season started and they probably even did stuff last year after the season ended. I guess what I am trying to say is that these kids put in a LOT OF TIME to pursue one thing--the state title.

And many high school students will get scholarship offers from colleges and universities to play sports at their school. Therefore, the decision-making process for colleges and degree choices is quickly approaching for those in their last years of high school.

There are many factors into a college choice such as:

  • Location in relationship to where their parent's live
  • Size of the college and campus
  • Financial package
  • Athletics
  • Degree programs
  • Public or private college/university
  • Size of dorm rooms
  • Where their friends are going
  • Etc.
However, one of the factors that often students miss or seemingly forget when deciding colleges or universities is this: 

Is there a church nearby that I love? Is there a church nearby at all? If there is a church nearby, can I get involved?

Students year after year go to college and begin the independent lifestyle. And they were raised to go to church at least once a Sunday (sometimes twice!). But when it came to the first Sunday in the Fall semester; there were no parents to wake you up for church; there was no cinnamon rolls for breakfast and no alarm clock to wake up to that was set for church time. Actually, most students forget about church altogether when they move to college. It becomes an 'option' for them to attend and to be involved in.

Parents don't often think of this either when they are taking their child for a college visit; it doesn't even cross their mind. Actually, all they are thinking of is the financial package and degree programs because they see this time of schooling as 'training for the future'. 

While this is all true; what parents don't help students do and what many church leaders don't do for students is help them train now for the future; this is not physical or mental training--it is training to be godly.

Paul says to Timothy (a young pastor in Ephesus) that "bodily training has some value". We train our bodies so many ways nowadays--running, exercising, yoga, weight lifting, and many exercising machines--that we almost become a slave to our own bodies. We want the best 'shape' of our bodies and the best 'toned' muscles that we can get (thank you culture). 

But not everyone can have the best because then who would be the best? Being the best and most 'fit' is a never-ending cycle that we cannot win.

Our bodies are 'temples of the Holy Spirit within you, whom we have from God" (1 Corinthians 6:19).

So while we train our bodies, it does have some value--yes to be healthy. Being healthy and content with our physique is a different story than wanting the best 'tone' and 'shape' we can get. Content and healthy.

But 'godliness is of value in every way".

Every way.

All things.

All situations.

Every chapter of life.

Every situation that we find our self in.

Godliness is of value for all the above and in every way.

Bodily training is of value--for a little while.

Godliness is of value in every way.

Godly training comes from church; education; personal devotions and prayer and communion with the Triune God--this is godly training.

So just like the college students who are looking for colleges want to train themselves physically and mentally in preparation for their future careers.

I appeal to you college-bound students; if you are moving away to college, consider the options of churches in the surrounding area you will be in.

Not only will you be training physically and mentally, but with the help of the church and the Holy Spirit; you will be training for godliness also.

And just a few verses later; Paul says to Timothy in 1 Timothy 4:12 

"Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity."


When we train for godliness; we set an example in our speech, conduct, love, faith and purity. 

When we train for godliness; we fight the good fight of the faith, and we flee all evil and pursue righteousness.

When we train for godliness; we realize that we can be content in all circumstances (plenty and empty)

When we train for godliness; we guard the deposit entrusted to us. 

When we train for godliness; we pursue Christ.

So college-bound students; what do you value?

Bodily training and/or godliness?

November 20, 2013

Introduction to the Belgic Confession

I never really knew the Belgic Confession until I started teaching it in 2010 to 11th grade students at the church I attend. Even though I knew little of it beforehand; I've come to love it through classes I've taken as well as teaching this wonderful document.

To obtain a copy of the Belgic Confession; click here.

Here are some quick facts about this document for starters:

1. It was authored by one man, Guido de Bres in 1561 B.C. (2 years before the Heidelberg Catechism)
2. The original language it was written in was French; then later on Latin and Dutch versions were translated.
3. The audience whom de Bres was writing to was persecuted Christians and those who were doing the persecution--namely King Phillip and his armies.
4. There are 37 articles in which de Bres addresses many different topics.
5. Even though it is authored by one man; it was written in the plural form "we"
6. Articles 8, 9, 18 and 37 are the only ones which don't begin with "we"; however, they are still written in the plural form
7. It is often referred to as "the bloody document"
8. Belgic refers to the whole of the Netherlands, both north and south, which today is divided into the Netherlands and Belgium
9. Article 36 was changed by the CRC Synod of 1958 because it deemed some lines unbiblical. Article 37 was changed by the CRC Synod of 1985 which placed a paragraph in the footnotes; rather in the body of the text
10. There are not many Scripture references like the Heidelberg Catechism, but it is still deeply embedded from Scripture
11. The goal of the Belgic Confession was to prove the Reformed faith from the Word of God and to show Spanish authorities that the Reformed people were not rebels, but law abiding Christians
12. There is no explicit theme that stands out above the rest

So there are a few facts. Now some historical context would serve us well to get the feel for the purpose, need and setting that this document was written in.

Political-Religious Structure:
King Phillip II was in Spain ruling Belgium as did his Father Charles V did. They were both strong and loyal to the Catholic faith and equally concerned with the spread of the Protestant faith. Although King Phillip II was ruling Belgium; there is great evidence to think that he never set foot in Belgium himself. However, he sees the spread of Protestantism and decides to move into Belgium to get Protestantism out and to gain complete power and to spread the Catholic faith. In 1567 King Phillip II had 16,000 troops move to the Netherlands from Spain which made the people living in Belgium extremely unhappy; therefore they rebelled and began an independent movement.
King Phillip II issued the Catholic faith to be the only faith allowed at the time; however, the Protestants and Reformers would have none of it. They were deeply zealous for the Reformed faith and would not give it up. Many though, feared for their lives as they hid "underground" while others fled to various places around the countryside. Guido de Bres was a pastor at the time and stayed local to strengthen believers during difficult times of persecution and trouble. After writing this document; he sent it to John Calvin for approval which passed with flying colors according to Calvin. The next move then, was to send this document to King Phillip II. A copy of the Belgic Confession as well as a letter to King Phillip II was tossed over the castle wall, but no one knows whether this ever reached the king or not. It was later adopted at a Synod meeting held underground in 1566 in Antwerp to be confession of the Reformed faith.
On May 30, 1567 de Bres faced his killers right in front of him which made him one of the estimated 10,000 Dutch citizens to lose their lives during this time.
Cornelius Plantinga Jr. wrote a book called A Place to Stand which says this about the Belgic Confession "The Belgic Confession is a highly Calvinistic document that breathes the spirit of courage in persecution.....Guido de Bres risked, and finally gave, his life under the firm conviction that nothing could ever tear him out of the grasp of his heavenly Father."
And in the Ecumenical Creeds and Reformed Confessions gray book published by Faith Alive; it says this: "In 1562 a copy was sent to King Phillip II, together with an address in which the petitioners declared that they were ready to obey the government in all lawful things, but that they would offer their backs to stripes, their tongues to knives, their mouths to gags, and their whole bodies to the fire, rather than deny the truth expressed in this confession."

Now that is powerful.

The Belgic Confession was written to those being persecuted--other Christians--to unify their faith, to bring comfort and to educate people who want to understand the Reformed faith deeper. It was also written to the persecutors--King Phillip II and his followers to prove that the church has been in this place of trial and persecution before, therefore you can't snuff it out (Article 27).
And it was written as an apologetic to claim that the Reformers weren't like the rebellious Anabaptists (at the time), to prove that they were peace-loving, law abiding citizens and to distinguish the Reformers from the Catholics and the Anabaptists.

It is this light of historical context that this document must be read. If we read it in any other context, it is not as powerful and not as convicting to the soul of mankind.

There is blood all over this document; may we never forget the efforts of Guido de Bres and the Reformed Christians during this terrible era for the church.


Here are two suggested structures/outlines of the Belgic Confession:
The first follows the 7 heads of doctrine (which I really like!) or the Biblical Narrative:
Articles 1-11 Theology Proper (God)
Articles 12-17 Theological Anthropology (the Biblical study of humanity)
Articles 18-21 Christology (the study of Christ)
Articles 22-26 Soteriology (the study of salvation)
Articles 27-36 Ecclesiology (the study of the church)
Article 37 Eschatology (the study of the last things)

The second is a more traditional order:
Articles 1-11 God and how God is Known
Articles 12-13 Creation and Providence
Articles 14-16 Fall and Election
Articles 17-21 Salvation in Christ
Articles 22-26 Justification and Sanctification
Articles 27-29 The Church
Articles 30-32 Church Order
Articles 33-35 Sacraments
Article 36 The Church and State
Article 37 The Last Things

There are a few good resources out there, but they are hard to find. Some that I've found beneficial are as follows: 

1. A Place to Stand by Cornelius Plantinga Jr. (I believe it is out of print now)
2. A blog by Dr. Kim Riddlebarger who did a series on the Belgic Confession. Click here for a link to the blog postings
3. Class notes from Kuyper College under the teaching of Dr. Branson Parler and class notes from Calvin Theological Seminary under the teaching of Dr. Lyle Bierma
4. My own personal study of the Belgic Confession

November 19, 2013

The Purpose of Confessions

In order to understand the Christian Reformed Church's (CRC) Confessions, it is important to begin with the purpose of the them.

Why do we have them? What good are they?

1. Confessions provide unity and protect against disunity
Confessions give the church a common belief; they provide clear and concise statements of what the church believes, therefore those who know the confessions know what the church believes. This provides harmony among believers of a certain denomination and it protects against someone trying to teach or lead against the confessions in that denomination. When church members don't know what they believe; it is easy for disunity to happen.

2. Confessions are great for teaching the Christian faith
Confessions are great documents for teaching younger members of the church (and older members!) what the church believes. They speak about God, how to live and act in a Christian manner, how to relate to the government, how to pray, etc. These documents are great to train members of the church in what the church believes so then those who learn these documents may go out to share what they have learned into all the world. (I know missionaries who use the Heidelberg Catechism for evangelism....)

3. Confessions are derived by Scripture
Confessions are derived and rooted in Scripture; therefore, they are not in higher authority above Scripture. Scripture is the final authority; therefore the confessions are summaries of what Scripture says. However, when arguing a point from the confessions, it is best to be driven back to the Scripture. This also, is what makes the Confessions relate to all aspects of life. If they are derived from Scripture, and if Scripture is useful for all of life; shouldn't then the confessions be the same also?

4. The Confessions are embedded in a rich, deep history that we cannot ignore
The confessions were written long ago (more on the dates, etc. later) through difficult circumstances. There were many other confessions or documents similar to them written; however, these are the ones that we have today and these are the ones that the CRC recognizes as confessional status.

This is a short list of the purpose/importance of confessions. I may add more later.

To God be the glory.

A New Series: The Confessions of the Christian Reformed Church [HC & BC & COD]

One of the perks of ministering to youth is teaching them the Christian Reformed Church's confessions.

The Christian Reformed Church has 3 confessions:
1. Heidelberg Catechism (the most well known)
2. Belgic Confession (the "bloody document")
3. Canons of Dort (FYI--NOT real canons, but pretty close; just as Jacob Arminius)
However, not many think of this as a perk. But I absolutely love teaching the confessions. I teach 11th grade students; and before they have me as their teacher, they are taught for 2 years the Heidelberg Catechism. Then I teach them the Belgic Confession and the Canons of Dort.

I never really got into the confessions when I was in high school, but I absolutely love them now and realized that I certainly missed out!! Therefore it is my ministry to pray for these students to fall in love with these documents and to teach them how these old and seemingly "outdated" documents relate to our lives in the 21st century (pretty much every....single......day).

Therefore, in this blog, I thought I'd reflect on these confessions--starting with the Belgic Confession and then I don't know. I guess we will just have to see how it goes.......not sure how it is going to go, but it will go.

First, I will start out with the necessity/benefit/advantage/etc. of having confessions; then I will give some historical information on the Belgic Confession and then I'll start with Article 1 working all the way through each article until I end. (I am unsure if I will incorporate the Heidelberg Catechism and/or the Canons of Dort in this time around; maybe I will go through each one of those separately as well...who knows?!)

Fasten your seat belts folks (no idea who even reads this); it is about to be a crazy, yet enjoyable ride!

God-speed.

P.S. I am unsure of how many times I will be able to update them; I've got a busy few months ahead here with Thanksgiving, Youth Group Stuff, Christmas celebrations, candidacy, preaching, exams, papers, etc. etc. etc. I'll do my best though, to post regularly.

Blessings.

November 15, 2013

Preaching 101

I love to preach.

I have been struggling with preaching lately--not preaching in general, but ways or methods of preaching.

Let me explain.

I have been taught a method of preaching called "the four page method" or "four pages of a sermon". This is taught by professors at Calvin Theological Seminary due to an influence from Paul Scott Wilson.

Let me break it down a bit.

The four pages of a sermon are not literal pages; rather they are four movements of a sermon. Here they are:

1. Trouble in the Text (Page 1)
Here the preacher finds what is called the trouble in the text--the problem at hand. An example would be from Romans 14:1-4. The historical context usually provides a clear trouble in the text. So in Rome; the Jews were deported out of the city, therefore the Gentiles were in charge of the church. However, when the Jews were allowed back in the city, there was confrontations that were happening over ritual practices such as dietary laws. The trouble is found in vs 1 "Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters." The trouble here is the Roman Christians were not accepting others; therefore they were passing judgment. Seems clear.

2. Trouble in the World (Page 2)
Then on page 2, it would be relating it to the trouble in the world which is similar to the trouble in the text. So a good example would be relating it to Sunday dress. Some people think that only a suit and tie and dress is allowed in church; while others think that jeans are okay and casual clothes are appropriate. These two groups judge each other and don't accept one another. Seems clear again.

3. Grace in the Text (Page 3)
On page 3; it is called the grace in the text; meaning, what does the author say to fix the trouble? Well Paul says that we should "accept him whose faith is weak". Therefore the grace would be that we should accept others views. We shouldn't judge them (vs 4) and the Lord will make him stand. It seems pretty clear here what the grace is.

4. Grace in the World (Page 4)
On page 4; then it swings back to the world and relating the grace in the text to the grace in the world. The grace in the world is essentially the same in as the grace in the text.

However, I don't think the 4 page method can be applied to all passages of Scripture. There are certain passages where this just doesn't seem to apply very well if a preacher wants to find the truth of the passage and exposit it clearly.

One emphasis of the four page method is story telling and the use of images/illustrations to keep the audience attentive and interested. They intend to have a story, image or illustration for the introduction and conclusion as well as one of those for each page of the sermon. And they want to keep in to 20 minutes.

To me, this does two things. It shows me that their view of the power of the Word of God could be lower than mine and secondly, it shows that they are there for the people's attention rather than preaching.

I've heard many sermons that were easily 45 minutes to an hour (sometimes more!) that have held my attention the whole time (without ANY stories/illustrations/images--straight up exposition!) and have gripped my heart. I am not saying that the use of stories/illustrations and images are bad; I do use them, but I only use 1 or 2 in my sermons (which are normally 30-35 minutes.........) because I believe that preaching is exposition. Preaching is explaining the text and the power of the Holy Spirit is powerful enough to grip anyone's heart and the power of the Word of God can transform any life.

Another emphasis that the four page method emphasizes is this: "show don't tell". This means that don't just tell the congregation that there were problems in the church in Rome, but show them. Tell a made up story about a possible situation or scenario that was going on. Such as this: "In Rome, some believers thought that eating pork, shrimp and fish were okay, while others thought that only eating cabbage, celery and tomatoes was appropriate; therefore this created conflict and judgments being passed."

This emphasis of "showing and not telling" is one that drives me nuts. I feel as if it goes outside of what the text says. It is making a situation and scenario up that isn't even true and very unlikely to happen. And if God's Word doesn't say; can a preacher say it? Can a preacher assume it?

Sinclair Ferguson says this, "We [preachers] are at our best when we speak of Christ and at our worst when we speak of us."

I would agree.

Preaching is not about the preacher; not about a story that happened. Preaching is about the Word of God meeting people's life through the work of the Holy Spirit.

Another emphasis and the last one I want to discuss is their use of "God active language" meaning that sermons shouldn't say "We must do this...." or "We must do that..." Rather, sermons must say, "God does this..." or "The Holy Spirit does...."

But then, what do we do with Paul's imperatives where he explicitly tells the Christians to whom he is writing to, to do something??????? Do we just ignore them?

Of course; it isn't all about doing something, but I believe that Christianity has lost the zeal to actually know and follow Christ.

Following Christ is a call to die to everything. Because when we die, we actually find life in Christ.

And life in Christ is to live in union with Him.

When we are united to Christ; we have left the old way of life in Adam (the first one); therefore we have no reason and no desire to go back to that lifestyle.

Yes grace is important and that is how and why we are saved, BUT an overemphasis of one over the other can create a false sense of Christianity.

Brothers and sisters; may we strive to follow Christ our Lord by the way that He wants us to live and act in a worthy of the manner to which we were called.

Praise be to the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and to the powerful and wonderful working of the Spirit and to the gracious and merciful Father whom we call Abba.

To God be the glory for ever and ever!
Amen.

November 11, 2013

The Pleasures of the World

Lately I've been burdened by the pleasures of the world.

For example; I went to MSU and saw first hand what one of the college students at my church has to deal with on a daily basis. And a few other college students who I've been in touch with via email; letter and Facebook are all dealing with the pleasures of the world and what it means to be in the world, but not of it.

My devotional readings have been lately about not wanting or not needing anything but Christ. Christ is our whole portion that we need. We don't need anything else.

And just various situations that I've been in have reminded me of the pleasures of the world.

Now the pleasures of the world offer immediate satisfaction and pleasure. They offer a "good" feeling that will last for a short period of time.

And then usually, after engaging in this pleasure; when the satisfaction goes away; there enters in guilt.

And if not guilt; then something needs to be checked over on your sanctificationodometer.

It is interesting to me how Christians can sometimes make excuses for allowing themselves to partake in the "pleasures of the world" or even make exceptions to partake in them even when they know they are wrong. And even though they know they are wrong; they still think it is okay to do them; just for a little bit and just this once.

However, one exception turns in to a more frequent time; and a continual cycle is born.

This is why Paul commands Timothy in 6:11-12 "But as for you, O man of God, flee these things. Pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, steadfastness, gentleness. Fight the good fight of the faith."

There is a lot more going on here in the context of this passage; but the main three words here are "flee", "pursue" and "fight".  These are all three commands that we all should do continually.

1. "Flee these things" is a command to flee--run away from--all the worldly pleasures that are out there. "these things" refers to 6:1-10, but also all that is mentioned in the letter of 1 Timothy--fleeing all the worldly pleasures. The image that comes to my mind of fleeing is when a thief is running from a cop. The cop is doing everything he can to catch this thief; however, the thief is doing everything he can to get away from the cop--he jumps over walls, climbs fences; throws trash cans over, etc--everything he does is to flee the cop. The cop is a representation of the devil working through worldly pleasures and the thief is us; running as fast as we can to flee the worldly pleasures.

2. "Pursue" is the opposite of flee. Pursue is what the cop is doing in the above illustration. We are to be the cop pursuing a thief in jumping over the same walls; running  down alleys and jumping over trash cans, etc. Except we are to not pursue the worldly pleasures; we are to pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, steadfastness, gentleness. This is quit the list of things to pursue if you ask me, but any godly pursue would want to pursue these things way more than the pleasures of the world.

3. "Fight" the good fight of the faith. Yes, as Christians, we are in a battle with not a physical enemy, but a spiritual enemy therefore it is a spiritual battle (Ephesians 6:10-17). And we too, must fight this battle. Notice that this is a "good fight" and it is a "good fight of the faith". It isn't just some pointless fight that we are doing; it is a purposeful fight that we engage in every single day and night. Our guard must always be up; for when it is down; then it is a time that we aren't fighting.

So this challenge is not just for you who read, but for me also: to flee the worldly desires; to pursue what a godly person desires; and to fight the good fight of the faith.

May the Lord bless the elect as they daily take up their armor of God and take their ground to stand and to fight.

Romans 5:20-6:14 "Now What?"

I received this text as an assigned text on which I was to preach on 11/7 at Calvin Theological Seminary. I was given Romans 6:1-7; but I thought it needed to include more of the surrounding verses; therefore I expanded it. And here is my sermon from that; I actually preached it in a church first (Zutphen CRC) and then at CTS.


I. Introduction
            In the history of the United States of America; there have been many significant moments which have changed and molded our country to who we are today. One of those moments came on September 22, 1862.

President Abraham Lincoln issued a proclamation, which began this way and I quote: “On the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or any designate part of a State, the people whereof shall then in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” This certainly was a significant event in the history of our country.

            However, the Union would have to fight for many months before slaves in the South could claim their precious freedom. And after the final surrender of the Confederacy, the assassination of a president, and a difficult political fight, the United States ratified the 13th Amendment, which officially abolished slavery in America. And on December 18, 1865 the news swept across the United States of America: slaves are free! Well, at least they were officially free from being slaves, but the practicality of their freedom was another matter.

            An 11 year old slave at this time, Booker T. Washington recorded these events in his autobiography saying, “The wild rejoicing on the part of the freed colored people lasted for a brief period of time, for I noticed that when they returned to their cabins; there was a change in their feelings. The great responsibility of being free, of having charge of themselves, of having to think and plan for themselves and their children, seemed to take possession of them. There was the questions of a home, a living, a job, the rearing of children, education, citizenship, and establishment and support of churches. Was it any wonder that within a few hours the wild rejoicing ceased and a feeling of deep gloom seemed to pervade the slave quarters? It was strange for them to think they had to actually break the attachment from their “old Master” or “old Missus”. Some of these people had spent half of a century with their masters and it was no light thing to think of parting.”

            You see, though the slaves were officially free to go anywhere, little changed for them in a practical sense. Legal freedom merely presented slaves with the opportunity to live as free men and women. But turning their legal status into an actual experience would require an internal transformation. Those who found this challenge too daunting, chose the uncomfortable familiarity of slavery instead. They didn’t want to break the bond between them and their Master and become united to a new and free life.

            Now doesn’t this seem foolish to you? For us who haven’t experienced slavery like this, it does seem very foolish. However, there are many Christians who do this same thing today. Time and time again, they choose slavery over freedom every single day. Having been set free, for them to live as free men and women comes neither easily or naturally. It is a process and, like salvation, it must be accomplished supernaturally.

            And this is what Paul speaks of in this section of Romans which we have read this evening. He is speaking of breaking the bond of the old life in Adam and becoming united to Christ. At the end of chapter 5, Paul boldly proclaims that where sin increased because of the law; grace increased all the more, so that grace might triumph over sin and death. Therefore, in chapters 6 and 7 of Romans; Paul pauses for a moment and explains how this can be. In chapter 6:1-2 he responds to an objection by the Jewish opponents in regards to this teaching of grace triumphing over sin and death. And in vs 3-11 Paul explains this in fuller detail by arguing that the knowledge of our baptism, our knowledge of the crucifixion and our knowledge of Christ’s victory over sin and death supports Paul’s teaching of grace triumphing over sin and death. Ultimately, what Paul has written to the Romans in 5:12-21 is about the believer’s freedom in Christ by being united to Him. And this same theme of union with Christ is what Paul continues to explain in chapter 6. But before we go there; we must understand the Jewish opponents objection to Paul’s teaching of grace triumphing.

II. We Died to Sin vs 1-2

            The Jewish opponents of Paul were criticizing him for preaching and teaching that the Gospel of justification by grace through faith without works seemed to stimulate or even encouraged people to sin more than ever! Paul’s critics were implying that Paul’s Gospel of free grace actually encouraged lawlessness and put a premium on sin. They thought that free grace promised sinners the best of both worlds: they could indulge themselves freely in this world and its pleasures without any fear of forfeiting the next world because grace would eventually triumph! They thought that grace gave believers a license to sin. Therefore, just as the letter of Jude combats this; so too, Paul argues against this based on the knowledge of the believer’s union with Christ.

            In vs 1, Paul raises the objection in the form of a question by asking, “What shall we say then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase?” So basically, in other words, he is asking—“If grace is going to continually increase and if we want to make God look good; why don’t we just continue in sin, so God can continually extend His grace to us? Because then this would make God look really good!” or even, “Why should we be afraid of sinning if God will forgive and let grace reign?” And if we are honest with ourselves, people of God; there are many believers and maybe ourselves who have asked something similar to this question that the Jewish opponents were raising against Paul.

            But Paul answers this objection sharply in vs 2 by saying, “By no means!” By no means shall we go on sinning so that grace might increase! When it is literally translated, Paul’s answer is: “Let it not be”. You see, this is an unthinkable position for Paul; it is folly to even think this says the apostle. Thinking that grace gives us a license to sin overlooks God’s purpose in the plan of salvation; it overlooks God’s means of saving sinners and it overlooks the understanding of God’s grace. You see, grace is neither diminished nor withdrawn because of sin. And Paul is stating that the goal of grace is to destroy sin; not to live in it.

            Therefore, Paul makes another statement and another question in vs 2 in response to his opponents. He says, “We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?” Now this phrase here is an important phrase. You see, if we don’t understand this phrase; then we will completely miss the point of this passage. There are two observations that must be noted to help us fully understand this. First, Paul uses the personal plural pronoun “we” to include himself and all those who are believers—to whom he was writing and for us today. He doesn’t have to supply this pronoun because it already is in the verb; however, by adding it; this is a way of emphasizing a point in the Greek.

And secondly, the word “died” in the Greek is in the Aorist tense meaning that this death is referring to a single action that has taken place and is completed in the past. So basically what Paul is saying is that if you are a believer, Paul is talking to you—he is saying that you have died to sin. And since this point is important to understanding the rest of the passage; we must pause and ask ourselves a few questions—as a believer, do you understand that you have died to sin? As a believer, do you realize that since you have died to sin that you cannot live in it any longer?

Paul is saying that the Gospel he preaches doesn’t cause people to sin or encourage sinful behavior because all believers have died to sin. And in the remainder of this passage; Paul argues believers have died to sin, therefore they cannot live in it any longer.

III. Knowledge of Our Baptism vs 3-4

             Moving on to verses 3-4 Paul turns to the subject of baptism to support his point that believers have died to sin. He assumes that what he is going to say is common knowledge for the Christians in Rome when he writes, “don’t you know”. This is common Christian knowledge that all believers are to have, therefore this shouldn’t be anything new to the first time hearers of this letter in Rome. And even us today; this should be common knowledge that all believers should know.

You see, when we are baptized into Christ; we died to sin. Now Paul isn’t teaching that baptism somehow magically destroys the power of sin; rather, what Paul is teaching is that baptism is an outward physical sign of the inward spiritual reality of the person being baptized.

            In the early church baptism was done very often and it was done by way of immersion—where the believer would be completely immersed in the water—they would go under the water and be fully submerged in it. And then, as they rise out of the water; it was the mark of the completion of their baptism. Now I am not arguing that we should only immerse people at baptism because this is not what Paul is arguing for either; it was just how the early church did it back then. You see, baptism was a sign of a person being buried with Christ as he or she would go down under the water and it was  sign of rising to new life in Christ as they came up out of the water. This dying and rising were outward physical signs of an inward spiritual reality of the person being baptized.

            And because through our baptism we have been buried with Christ and risen to a new life in Christ; now we are united to Christ in His death, in His burial and in His resurrection as vs 5 states. And this union with Christ is done by the work of the Holy Spirit in our hearts, minds and lives. The Holy Spirit empowers us to live a new life in Christ so that we no longer desire sin.

            Our baptism signifies our union with Christ; and if we are in union with Christ; many believers ask the question “now what?” “Now what are we supposed to do?” Well, at the end of vs 4 Paul says that “we too may live a new life.”

            But you see, this is not always the way that we want it. We are like the freed slaves in 1865 who didn’t really want to be free; they would still rather be united to their Master. This should not be people of God; for to go back to our old way of sinning is complete foolishness. We have been given a new life to live in Christ in which this life acknowledges and knows that we died to sin. So let me ask you people of God; since Paul claims that this is common knowledge; do you know your baptism and what it signifies? Do know that your baptism has united you to Christ in His death, burial and resurrection?

            When we know these things people of God, our death to sin makes so much more sense.


IV. Knowledge of the Crucifixion vs 6-7

            And secondly, our death to sin makes sense when we also have knowledge of the crucifixion as Paul says in vs 6-7. When Paul refers to the “old self” in vs 6; he means our union with the first Adam who was the author of sin; and this union with Adam—this old self has been crucified with Christ—our old self is dead. And Christ, the author of salvation, took the “old self” of believers and brought it to the cross for us because we could not die to sin ourselves. Therefore, since our “old self” is crucified with Christ; believers died to sin.

            And the result of this crucifixion is two-fold: first, in vs 6 Paul states that “the body of sin might be done away with.” The “body of sin” which Paul speaks about is the rule of sin that lives in the world and in the body still to this day—“the body of sin” is the Christian’s actual inclination to sin. As we are eagerly awaiting the day of the glorification of our bodies when Christ comes again; we know that sin is still in this world; therefore we must deal with it appropriately. And also in vs 6 is the second result of this crucifixion of the old self which Paul says is “that we should no longer be slaves to sin.” We no longer have sin ruling over us. Sin is no longer our master and we no longer have to submit to its authority. We now have a new Master and we have now submitted ourselves to another authority—namely the Lordship of Jesus Christ. We are no longer united with the first Adam; for he brought death as Paul says in chapter 5. We are now united to Christ and given new life.

            Yes we still sin, but we do not need to sin. And we will sin less and less as we go on in the Christian life maturing our faith. And when Christ comes again, and we are in our glorified state, we will be able not to sin. We will not be tempted by sin or be able to fall into sin. For if we died to sin now; then we will be dead to sin for eternity.

Therefore, this begs the question, people of God; as a believer, do you know that your old self in Adam was crucified with Christ? As a believer, do you know that this crucifixion broke the rule of sin on your life and now you no longer have to be a slave to sin?

For if anyone has died with Christ; then we are freed from sin.

V. Knowledge of Christ’s Victory vs 8-10

            And thirdly as Paul explains in vs 8-10; we must have the knowledge of Christ’s victory. When Christ was crucified; He took our “old self” to the cross and we were given new life just as when Christ was given new life when He was resurrected from the dead. And through this resurrection, Paul says that “death no longer has mastery over Him [Christ].” You see, Christ triumphed over sin and death when He was resurrected to new life from the dead. And so too says Paul, if we died to sin, then “We will also live with Him.” For our baptism has united us to Christ; therefore we share in all that Christ did as far as His death, His burial and His resurrection and we share in all that He has in the Father.

            Commentator James Montgomery Boice says that this is a way of speaking of our present resurrection. Indeed there will be a future resurrection, but this is not what these verses are about; they are referring to an experience of the resurrected life in the here and now. You see, this is what Paul has been writing about—being dead to sin means that we cannot go back to that old lifestyle—we died to it; therefore, how could we go back?

When a believer has been united to Christ; he or she has died to sin. He or she is on the way to God and can never return to his or her former state of existence. We are united to Christ and we can never be plucked out of this union. We are united to Him forever! Praise be the God for this good news!

            And once again, it begs the question of us people of God; as a believer, do you know that Christ has been victorious over sin and death?

If so, then surely you know that when you died to sin; you were united to Christ in newness of life.

VI. Our Response vs 11

            Since we have been united to Christ and we have knowledge that we died to sin; Paul exhorts his readers for this first time in this letter to respond to what God has done. Therefore, in vs 11 Paul names our response saying that we need to “Count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Jesus Christ.” You see, if we died to sin; then we can be assured and confident that we have been made alive to God in Jesus Christ. We can count on it.

            And there are two realities in vs 11 that Paul says that we must count on: the first reality is being dead to sin and the second reality is being alive to God. Now, we have already examined these two realities throughout this passage; but here is a quick summary: being dead to sin means that we died to the old life in Adam and now we cannot go back to it. If we go back to the old life of sin in Adam; it is like an adult going around acting like a toddler; or a married man going back to the life of being a bachelor. It may work in some areas and for a little bit of time; however, for the most part; it just doesn’t work the way that it should.

            And the second reality is being alive to God which completes the parallel in vs 5 where we discussed how now we are in a present resurrection state; and this is where vs 11 has brought us to. It tells us that just as we have died to sin, so also we have been made alive to God in Jesus Christ. Being alive to God means that we are now reconciled to God; we have become new creatures in Christ; we are freed from sin’s bondage; we can no longer be satisfied with this world and its pleasures; and we are pressing forward to a sure destiny and new goals.

            Therefore, we are now pilgrims here on earth. We are passing through like the author of Hebrews says of Abraham in chapter 11, saying that we are “Looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.” (vs 10).

VII. Conclusion

            In conclusion, we now return to the opening question that Paul asked of the first listeners which also is asked of us today; “We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?” How can we live in sin any longer if we have died to it?

And now we should be able to answer this question; possibly this way; “I know that I am united to Christ in my baptism. I know that my old self has been crucified with Christ on the cross and I know that Christ has become victorious over sin and death and I am united to Christ in His life, in His death and in His resurrection. Therefore, how can such a person as I who has died to sin and been made alive to God in Jesus Christ live in sin any longer?!”

            However, just as the freed slaves in America in 1865 couldn’t grasp the fact and gain the responsibility of living as freed men and women; many believers; many Christians today are the same way—we have been freed from slavery and given a new life.

Yet we often find ourselves desiring slavery over freedom. We have desired to stay in union with our old self in Adam rather than being united to Christ to experience newness of life.

            People of God; if you are a believer, you can have the confidence that you have been removed from your former state of being united to Adam to being united with Christ. Our job is to reckon it so, to count on it.

Therefore we must answer the Apostle Paul’s question of “How can we who died to sin live in sin any longer?” We must answer,

“I can’t! I died to sin and a person like me has better things to do than to keep on sinning.”